JABALPUR, India, Jan. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 17: This is a petition contending that the Collector, who is the Arbitrator, who has to decide the application under section 3(G)(5) of the National Highway Act, 1956 is sitting over the matter is not finally deciding the same. In view of the fact that an innocuous prayer made in the petition, the petition is disposed of directing the Collector to decide the application under Section 3(G)(5) of th...
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 17: 1. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State submits that allegations have been made by the petitioner against one particular Tehsildar and from the papers filed, no representation seems to have been given to the competent authority i.e. the concerned Commissioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to mak...
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 18: Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 18: Learned counsel for appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal, reserving the right of the appellant to file representation to the State Government against the appointment of respondent No.4. In view of the above, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 18: Learned counsel for appellant seeks leave to withdraw the writ appeal. Prayer is allowed. ccordingly, Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 18: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner very candidly admits that parts of the land which are required for construction of dam is owned by the fatherin-law of the petitioner. 2. Since there is a private interest involved, no public interest litigation is maintainable at the behest of the petitioner. 3. Petition is accordingly dismissed. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 18: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to approach the High Level Caste Scrutiny Committee. 2. In view of the above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the right of the petitioner. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 18: Learned counsel for the parties informed that the subject tender was for a period of one year, which expired in the month of November, 2025 and petitioner has continued to provide services in view of the interim order dated 28.02.2025 directing that the tender, which is subject matter of the present petition, shall not be awarded till further orders. Since the original period of tender is over...
JABALPUR, India, Jan. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Dec. 18: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even in the reply, respondents have admitted the amount claimed by the petitioner, however state that the amount shall be paid as and when the allocation is received from the higher authorities. Accordingly, petition is disposed off directing the respondents to clear the admitted amount within a period of two months from today. In case, petitione...
RANCHI, India, Jan. 19 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Dec. 18: No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submit that there is no merit in this case, hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this case. Accordingly, this case is dismissed for non-prosecution. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....