JABALPUR, India, Sept. 2 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 4: Learned counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petitions reserving the right of the petitioners to challenge the award under Section 3(G)(6) of the National Highway Act, 1956. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Sept. 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 1: 1. Heard Mr. M.B. Lal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Bishwambhar Shastri, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Notice upon the O.P. No. 2 has already been effected, however he has chosen not to appear in the matter and earlier the matter was adjourned several times. 3. This revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 20.09.2019, passed by the learned Additional Sessions J...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 1: 1. Heard Mr. Rishav Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State and Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 2. 2. This revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 06.08.2019, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur, in connection with Pakur (T) P.S. Case No. 186 of 2017 corresponding t...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 1: 1. Mr. Shadab Ansari, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner on instruction seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent State has got no objection for the same. 3. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending petition if any also stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Sept. 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 1: 1. In both the cases, common question of facts and laws are involved and in view of that, both these petitions are being heard together with consent of the parties. 2. Heard Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners in both the cases, Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha and Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the State in respective cases and Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for opposite party no....
RANCHI, India, Sept. 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 1: 1. In both the cases, common question of facts and laws are involved and in view of that, both these petitions are being heard together with consent of the parties. 2. Heard Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners in both the cases, Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha and Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the State in respective cases and Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for opposite party no....
RANCHI, India, Sept. 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 1: 1. Heard Mr. Sahil, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.06.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Chatra in M.C.A. No.1105 of 2025, arising out of Piparwar P.S. Case No.56 of 2023, corresponding to S.T. Case No.74 of 2025, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 1: I.A. No. 8654 of 2025 1. Heard Mr. Sahil, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Priya Shrestha, learned Spl. P.P. 2. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 25 days in filing the appeal. 3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 25 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. 4. The af...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 1: I.A. No. 7786 of 2025. Heard Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Vishwanath Roy, learned Spl. P.P. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning a delay of 09 days in filing the appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and a delay of 09 days in filling the appeal is hereby condoned. I.A. No. 7786 ...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 1: I.A. No. 8721 of 2025 Mr. D.K. Karmakar, learned counsel for the appellants is permitted to correct the provision of law as mentioned in the cause title of this interlocutory application during the course of the day. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning a delay of 52 days in filing the appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is...