RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the land has been acquired by the National Highway Authority for construction of National Highway under the National Highways Act. An Award has already been prepared but not in the name of this petitioner but in the name of other co-sharer. 3. It is ...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioners and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. It is grievance of the petitioners that the petitioners are regularly paying the rent of the land in question and the land is also recorded in the name of these petitioners but in the online digital records the name of some other person has been recorded. 3. It is the grievance of the petiti...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. It is the grievance of the petitioner that he has worked from 1995 to 2010 as a Sectional Officer under the Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Jharkhand. It is his grievance that he has not been paid his salary for the aforesaid period. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that it has to be first determined as to whether the petitioner has actually been engaged and worked, then only it c...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. The petitioner is challenging the judgment dated 28.01.2026 passed in the Appeal Dy. No. 1063 of 2024 by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad whereby and whereunder the Appeal preferred by the Bank against the order of Debts Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi has been allowed and has been he...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition and resort to the remedy of arbitration or other civil remedy for redressal of the grievances. 3. Mr. Prashant Pallav, the learned A.S.G.I., pointed out that this matter would involve grossly disputed questions of fact and the ...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent No.5. 3. The petitioner in this writ application has prayed for post retiral benefits. 4. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent No.4, it has been stated in para-7 that no cause of action survives against the respondents. After referring it, counsel for the responde...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent-JSSC. 2. Admittedly, the petitioners have obtained lesser marks than the last selected candidate in the category of the petitioners as per the State-wise merit list. 3. Considering the admitted position, no relief can be granted to the petitioners. 4. Since it has been admitted by the ...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent-JSSC. 2. The petitioners claimed for appointment on the post of Intermediate Trained Sahayak Acharya (Class-I to V) in the category of para teacher. 3. During course of argument, it has been jointly submitted by both the parties that except the petitioner No.6, namely, Gopal Thakur and the p...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: Ms. Akriti Shree, learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction of his client seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Both these petitions have been assigned to this Bench and that is how these matters have been listed before this Court. 2. CMP No.592 of 2025 has been filed for quashing of the order dated 18.02.2003 passed by Permanent Lok Adalat, Ranchi, in P.L.A. No. 270 of 2001, by which it has passed a compromise decree with respect of suit for Specific Performance of Contract being (Title Suit No. 12 of 2001) and ...