JABALPUR, India, Nov. 22 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 27: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the petition, the order passed by the Collector u/S 14 of the SARFAESI Act has been complied with. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents No.4 & 5 submits that since there was mandatory direction issued by order dated 09.10.2025, the possession was forcibly taken from the respondents No.4 & 5. He further submits that he had ap...
JABALPUR, India, Nov. 22 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 27: I.A.No.18237 of 2025 This is an application for condonation of delay of 125 days in filing the present MCC. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the MCC is condoned and IA stands allowed. M.C.C. No.2170 of 2025 Petitioner seeks restoration of W.P.No.26720/2024, which was dismissed for non-compliance of common conditional order dated 21.01.2025. The counsel for peti...
JABALPUR, India, Nov. 22 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 27: 1. Appellant impugns order dated 13.02.2025, whereby the Petition filed by the Appellant, seeking a direction to the respondent/authority not to proceed with show-cause notice dated 15.04.2024 and resolution dated 30.06.2024 passed by the Executive Council and to recall the said show passed and permit Professor, has been dismissed. 2. Respondent No. 2 by employment notice dated 22.02.2023 inv...
PATNA, India, Nov. 21 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Oct. 30: Heard the parties. 2. Invoking the prerogative writ jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioner seeks a direction commanding upon the respondents to ensure payment of arrears of difference of salary to the tune of Rs.8,78,358/- for which the petitioner is found entitled in terms with the order of this Court in CWJC No. 15610 of 2018 passed on 12.09.202. 3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that desp...
PATNA, India, Nov. 21 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Oct. 30: Heard the parties. 2. Invoking the prerogative writ jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioners, who are the aspirants for the post of School Teachers for Class-9 and 10 in terms with the Advertisement No. 26/2023, have approached this Court seeking a direction upon the respondents to issue their respective posting orders based upon the provisional appointment letters issued by the Respondent No.2 with all conse...
PATNA, India, Nov. 21 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Oct. 30: Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Advocate for the State and the University. 2. The hapless widow and the son of the deceased (erstwhile employee) of the University have approached this Court for the Post Retirement benefit of the deceased (erstwhile employee), including the gratuity, leave encashment, group insurance, provident fund as well as arrears of salary and other admissible dues...
PATNA, India, Nov. 21 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Oct. 30: Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned APP for the State. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the order dated 27.01.2021 passed in Complaint Case No. 49(C) of 2020 by the learned Magistrate 1st Class Masaurhi, Patna, whereby cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 498A of the IPC ...
PATNA, India, Nov. 21 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Oct. 30: Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the FIR in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 211 of 2024 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 313, 504, 506, 34 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The allegation i...
PATNA, India, Nov. 21 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Oct. 30: No one has appeared on behalf of the parties, however, Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned APP is present. 2. The record reveals that the notices have been validly served upon O.P. No.2, 3. The present application has been filed for quashing of order dated 05.04.2012 passed in Complaint Case No.516C/2011 by the learned SDJM, Lakhisarai, whereby the cognizance has been taken under Sections 498(A), 494 and 323 of IPC. 4. A...
PATNA, India, Nov. 21 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Oct. 30: Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners; learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned APP for the State. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the order taking cognizance dated 22.05.2023 passed in Patori P.S. Case No.92 of 2017 in G.R. No.562 of 2017, passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, whereby cogn...