JABALPUR, India, March 31 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 27: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to approach jurisdictional family court for redressal of his grievance. In view of the above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, March 31 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 27: By this application, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the the petition reserving his right to approach the Hon'ble Supreme Court with regard to Election of the Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh. Accordingly, I.A.No.4161 of 2026 is allowed. In view of the above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Cur...
JABALPUR, India, March 31 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 27: 1. Petitioner is aggrieved by an office order dated 23.01.2026, whereby the petitioner has been declared as a non performer. Petitioner is also aggrieved by an order dated 17.02.2026, whereby a decision has been taken by the respondents to carry out balance work at the risk and cost of the petitioner. Petitioner is also aggrieved by the order dated 20th February, 2026, whereby the petitioner h...
JABALPUR, India, March 31 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 27: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, March 31 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 27: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, March 31 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with the prayer to amend the instant Cr.M.P. by incorporating the details in para-2 and 2 (a) after para-5 of this Cr.M.P. and also to incorporate three paragraphs which have been numbered as 5.2 to 5.4 after para-5 by renumbering the present para- 5 as para- 5.1 of this Cr.M.P. to incorporate the details of surrende...
RANCHI, India, March 31 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in-spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this criminal miscellaneous petition as there is no merit in this criminal miscellaneous petition. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Disclaimer:...
RANCHI, India, March 31 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of State that the order has been complied and the FIR has been lodged. Copy of FIR has been filed along with counter affidavit dated 25.02.2026. Under the circumstance, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, March 31 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. This interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking withdrawal of this writ petition. 2. Considering the statement made in the said I.A., permission is granted to withdraw this writ petition. 3. I.A. No. 2182 of 2026 for withdrawal of this writ petition stands allowed. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndica...
RANCHI, India, March 31 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioners and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. The petitioners prays to quash Order No. 154 of 2024 contained in Memo No. 660 dated 5.11.2024 whereby their earlier service was not counted for the purpose of grant of pensionary benefits. 3. This is the second round of litigation. The petitioners earlier moved this Court by filing WP(S) No....