NAINITAL, India, Feb. 24 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 10TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 44 of 2026 Parvez Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent: Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. The applicant - Parvez is in judicial custody for ...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 24 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 10th JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 43 of 2026 Savesh Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Shariq Khurshid, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Applicant - Savesh is in judicial custody for ...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 24 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 10TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 38 of 2026 Angrej Singh Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Siddharth Bankoti, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent: Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. The applicant - Angrej Singh is in judic...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 24 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 10th JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 27 of 2026 Satayendra Singh Rawat Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Pratul Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 24 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 10th JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 26 of 2026 Shubhash Rawat Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Pratul Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, ...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 24 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 10: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 10th JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 5 of 2026 Rohit Pal alias Chotu Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand and Another Respondents Counsel for the Applicant: Ms. Amreen Bano, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Applicant Rohit Pal alia...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 24 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on JAN. 22: 1. The present application has been filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking a direction to permit the Applicant to furnish common sureties in respect of all 120 cases, as mentioned in the relief clause of the Application, in which bail has already been granted by the court below but the Applicant could not be released since he could not arrange the separate s...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 24 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on JAN. 22: 1. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners and to ensure that respondent nos. 4 to 7 do not harass, threaten, or cause any interference in the life and liberty of the petiti...
AGARTALA, India, Feb. 24 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Jan. 22: When the case is called, Mr. A.K. Deb, learned counsel appears on behalf of the applicant. It is seen from the Registry's note dated 21.01.2026 that steps for substitute service of notice i.e. through newspaper publication has been taken by the applicant and proof of newspaper publication has also been placed on record. But, there is no representation on behalf of the respondents. In view of the ab...
AGARTALA, India, Feb. 24 -- Tripura High Court issued the following order/judgement on Jan. 22: [1]Heard. [2] This is an appeal filed under Section-54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, against the judgment and award dated 15.09.2023 passed in CM L.A. 70 of 2022 by the learned Land Acquisition Judge, South Tripura, Sabroom. [3] The facts in brief are that, as per the requisition of the appellant, the land of the respondent-claimant, was acquired by the Land Acquisition Collector, South Trip...