NAINITAL, India, Feb. 3 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 5:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
Bail Application No. 01 of 2024
In
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 544 OF 2024
05TH JANUARY, 2026
Shamsher Bahadur
Applicant / Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
Respondent
Counsel for the Applicant / Appellant:
Mr. G.S. Latwal, learned counsel.
Counsel for the Respondent:
Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State.
The Court made the following:
ORDER
(per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Shri G. Narendar)
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant / appellant and the learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.
The short question that arose for consideration for disposal of the application is whether the trial court was right in placing reliance on the rulings recorded in paragraph 34, and whether the trial court was right in concluding that the blood sample of the newborn child was not collected.
The rest of the Judgment can viewed here:
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/cases/display_pdf.php?filename=bzPoyUlszYLCUcCpirIpqBONJemM28otdDUtCnS%2FAz11ay78E5p%2Fug2yBQ5Ohz3U&caseno=CRLA/544/2024&cCode=1&cino=UKHC010150922024&state_code=15&appFlag=
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
