NAINITAL, India, April 30 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on April 15:
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition Misc. Single No.893 of 2026
15 April, 2026
Ms Ram Chander Singh Bisht & Sons Pvt Ltd Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India and Others Respondents
Presence:-
Mr. Suryakant Maithani, learned counsel for petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Sharma, learned C.G.S.C. for the Union of India/respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel with Ms. Swati Verma, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent Nos.3 and 4.
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the communication dated 30.07.2024 and 09.11.2023 issued by respondent nos.1 and 2, whereby it was provided that the benefit of scheme known as Industrial Development Scheme, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "Scheme of 2017"), shall be extended only to those units which have been registered and not to the unregistered units.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner at the outset submitted that the case of petitioner is squarely covered by the order and judgment passed by Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh, wherein, the said communications dated 30.07.2024 and 09.11.2023 were subject matter and various writ petitions that were filed in the High Court of Himachal Pradesh were allowed by the learned Single Bench of the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh. The LPA there against was also dismissed.
3. The judgment and order passed by learned Single Judge as well as learned Division Bench in LPA of High Court of Himachal Pradesh attained finality up to Apex Court.
The rest of the judgment can view here:
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/cases/display_pdf.php?filename=I1mmm2bl4r4EREhYK63KvzyFNM3FuyD6GTHJjMTKjJaAqzllMQmJDpF8i9pEO1HQ&caseno=WPMS/893/2026&cCode=1&cino=UKHC010055542026&state_code=15&appFlag=
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
