NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6:
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Civil Revision No. 100 of 2025
06 January, 2026
Anupama Prakash - Revisionist
Versus
Anirudh Singh and others - Respondents
Presence:
Mr. Vishesh Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist.
Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
The instant revision has been preferred by the defendant against the order dated 15.09.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (S.D.) Dehradun in Original Suit No. 279 of 2025, titled as Anirudh Singh vs. Anupama Prakash and others, whereby the application preferred by the defendant under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, i.e., paper no. 26A1 has been rejected.
Instant matter was heard earlier on different stages and on 25.09.2025, further proceeding of O.S. No. 279 of 2025 was stayed. Relevant paragraphs of the order dated 25.09.2025 are reproduced herein as under:
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that plaintiff is nephew of the defendant no. 1 and he has given general power of attorney to the defendant/revisionist on 24.04.2015 and, being power of attorney holder of the plaintiff, defendant no. 1/revisionist executed five sale deeds.
The rest of the judgment can viewed here:
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/cases/display_pdf.php?filename=A9S7c5LDIsB6RXaCf816x3vnjLAc455o3cPu2TZmus7ljUy7ilkUkcsrVDaPzELX&caseno=CLR/100/2025&cCode=1&cino=UKHC010152812025&state_code=15&appFlag=
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
