GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 16: 1. Heard Mr. S. Chakraborty, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Mr. M. Chetia, the learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and Ms. A. Biyani, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent No. 2. 2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the Award dated 19.01.2023 (hereinafter referred to as, "the impugned award") passed by the lear...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 16: 1. Heard Dr. K U Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Jiten Payeng, learned Standing Counsel, FT & NRC. Also heard Shri P. Sharma, learned State Counsel, Assam; Mr. S S Roy, learned CGC and Shri H. Kuli, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Shri A I Ali, learned Standing Counsel, ECI. 2. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India t...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 16: 1. Heard Mr. M.K. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel; assisted by Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel; assisted by Mr. P.J. Phukan, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1-5. None appears for the respondent No.6, UGC. 2. In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, namely, Jayanta Kumar Sarma, has challen...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 16: Heard Mr. B.D. Das, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mrs. R. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Das, learned standing counsel for the Higher Education Department, being respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3; and Mr. R.A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5. 2. In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the Resolution N...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 16: 1. The petitioner no. 1 which is an Association along with 4 of its members has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging, inter alia, the action of the respondent nos. 4 to 7 taken on 02.02.2021 dispossessing / evicting the members of the petitioner no. 1 from land measuring 2 Bighas 1 katha of Dag No. 586 of K.P. Patta No. 75 and handing over possession of the same to t...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 16 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 16: 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. K. Borah, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. S. Chakraborty, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Mr. K. Gogoi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.2. 2. The petitioner herein has assailed the award dated 20.11.2019 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Cen...
JABALPUR, India, Nov. 16 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 17: Learned counsel for appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to approach the appropriate Revenue Authorities for redressal of his remedies. The appeal is according dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contention of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Nov. 16 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 17: Appellants impugn interim order dated 04.10.2024. By an order dated 07.10.2025 the subject writ petition has already been disposed of finally. Accordingly, the appeal has become infructuous. The same is, therefore, disposed of without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Nov. 16 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 17: IA No.16789 of 2025 This is an application for condonation of delay of 244 days in filing the present MCC. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the MCC is condoned and IA stands allowed. MCC No.2821 of 2025 Applicant seeks restoration of W.A.No.2205/2023, which was dismissed for non compliance of common conditional order. Learned counsel for the applicant submits t...
JABALPUR, India, Nov. 16 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 17: IA No.16788 of 2025 This is an application for condonation of delay of 243 days in filing the present MCC. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the MCC is condoned and IA stands allowed. MCC No.2818 of 2025 Applicant seeks restoration of W.A.No.2200/2023, which was dismissed for non compliance of common conditional order. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that...