RANCHI, India, March 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 25: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner, claiming to be the L1 bidder in the tender process, instituted this petition for acceptance of its bid. This petition was instituted on 09.05.2025. All defects were ultimately cleared on 13.02.2026, after opportunities were granted to the petitioner to clear the same. 3. Mr. Piyush Chitresh, learned AC to AG now states that since there was no in...
RANCHI, India, March 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 25: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. On 19.02.2026 after hearing the matter for some time, we made the following orders: "At the request of learned counsel for the respondents, we post this matter on 25.02.2026 high on board in order to enable him to obtain instructions and if necessary, to file an affidavit." 3. Today, Mr. Aditya Kumar, learned A.C. to Sr. S.C.-I, on instructions, states that DRC-...
RANCHI, India, March 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 25: 1. Mr. Anup Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners appears through the virtual mode. He does not complain about the clarity and quality of the audio and video. 2. Petitioners, in this writ petitions, have prayed for setting aside the cut-off date, that is, 01.08.2024 for computation of maximum age provided under clasuse-6 of the Advertisement No.12 of 2025 issued by Jharkhand Public Service Commission f...
RANCHI, India, March 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 25: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. On 18th of February 2026, we made the following orders: "1. Mr. Krishanu Ray, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that for the present the petitioner will be satisfied if some directions are issued for disposal of the petitioner's representation dated 9th February, 2026 by the respondents. 2. Mr. Piyush Chitresh, learned A.C. to A.G. re...
RANCHI, India, March 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 25: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Tax effect in this matter is below Rs. 2 crores. However, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant, states that he has no instructions to withdraw this appeal. 3. Accordingly, we dispose of this appeal on the grounds of low tax effect by leaving the questions of law open. 4. However, at the later stage, the appellant finds that the matter is cover...
RANCHI, India, March 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 25: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In this case, the tax effect is admittedly below Rs. 2 crores. However, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue submits that the matter falls within the exception under para 10(c) of the CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 which provides that adverse judgments relating to issues where Revenue Audit Objection in the case has been acce...
RANCHI, India, March 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 25: 1. Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal on the ground of low tax effect. 2. Leave is granted. 3. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn on the ground of low tax effect, by leaving the questions of law open. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, March 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 25: 1. Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal as well as the I.A. therein, on the grounds of low tax effect. 2. Leave is granted. 3. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn on the grounds of low tax effect by leaving the questions of law open. 4. I.A. No. 4338 of 2022 will not survive and is disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndicatio...
RANCHI, India, March 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 25: 1. The instant criminal appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10th September, 2003, passed by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-II, Khunti in S.T. Case No. 19 of 2002, whereby and whereunder both the appellants have been held guilty for the offences under Section 397 of I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years. Whereas appellant-Balter Kandulna was also convicted under...
RANCHI, India, March 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 25: 1. Heard Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 25.11.2003 and order of sentence dated 29.11.2003 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Gumla in Sessions Trial No. 267 of 2001,whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been held guilty and convicted for the offenc...