JABALPUR, India, June 4 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on May 4: 1. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner, being aggrieved by the charge sheet dated 25.06.2019 (Annexure P/1) issued by Respondent No. 2. By way of the impugned charge sheet, the petitioner has been subjected to disciplinary proceedings for a cause of action pertaining to the year 2013. 2. The petitioner seeks the indulgence of thi...
JABALPUR, India, June 4 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on May 4: 1. These are two analogous writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, arising out of rival claims for compassionate appointment following the death of a government employee in harness, hence this common order shall govern disposal of both the writ petitions. 2. Writ Petition No. 13968 of 2023 is taken as the lead case. The petitioner therein, Ritesh Van, seeks a writ of...
JABALPUR, India, June 4 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on May 4: 1. These are two analogous writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, arising out of rival claims for compassionate appointment following the death of a government employee in harness, hence this common order shall govern disposal of both the writ petitions. 2. Writ Petition No. 13968 of 2023 is taken as the lead case. The petitioner therein, Ritesh Van, seeks a writ of...
JABALPUR, India, June 4 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on May 4: 1. This criminal revision has been preferred by the petitioner-Aditya Rajpoot challenging the order dated 10.02.2026 passed by 4th Addl. Sessions Judge, Gadarwara, District Narsinghpur, in ST no.17/2026, whereby the Court below has dismissed an application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short 'the BNSS') filed by the petitioner-Aditya Rajpoot with the prayer ...
JABALPUR, India, June 4 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on May 4: 1. This appeal under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the appellant/State assailing the judgment and order of acquittal dated 22.09.2016 passed in Special Case No.04 of 2015 (State of M.P. vs. Rishikesh Mishra and Anr.) by the learned Special Judge Panna, District-Panna (M.P.), whereby the respondents/accused have been acquitted of the offence under Sections...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This I.A. seeks condonation of delay of 154 days in instituting this appeal. 3. We have perused the averments in the I.A. and we are satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown. Accordingly, delay is condoned and this I.A. is disposed of. L.P.A. No. 455 of 2025 4. With the consent of and at the request of learned counsel for the parties, we have taken7 ...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. I.A. No.11793 of 2025 seeks condonation of delay of 121 days in instituting this appeal. 3. Considering the reasons set out, we condone the delay and dispose of the aforesaid I.A. 4. With the consent of the learned counsel for the appellants, we have taken up this L.P.A. to consider whether it deserves admission. 5. By the impugned order, the learned Single...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal challenges the learned Single Judge's order dated 16th April, 2024. 3. The learned Single Judge has correctly held that the revenue authorities cannot decide on the issues of title and since such issues of title were sought to be raised in the mutation proceedings, the learned Single Judge did not permit the same. 4. According to us, there is no err...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. I.A. No.12627 of 2025 seeks condonation of delay of 170 days in instituting this appeal. 3. Considering the reasons set out, we condone the delay and dispose of the aforesaid I.A. 4. At the request and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is taken up for hearing. 5. The appellant seeks compassionate appointment with the respondents b...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal is directed against the learned Single Judge's order dated 03.11.2025 dismissing the petitioner's/appellant's W.P. (S) No. 5930 of 2025 by which the petitioner was in fact, seeking condonation of delay for document verification in the context of Jharkhand Laboratory Assistant Competitive Examination, 2023 in terms of Advertisement No. 01/2023. 3. The ...