PATNA, India, July 30 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 14:
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State.
2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs:-
"A. For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order/s, direction for the followings :-
I. To quash the order dated 21.04.2025 passed by the respondent no. 4 in ICDS Revision case no. 132/2024 whereby and where under the order dated 20.06.2024 passed by the respondent no. 6 in Anganbari Sevika/Sahaiyika Appeal No. 28/2022 has been upheld (Annexure- P/8).
II.To quash the order dated 20.06.2024 passed in
Anganbari Sevika/Sahaiyika Appeal No. 28/2022 passed by the respondent no. 6 in Anganbari Sevika/Sahaiyika Appeal No. 28/2022 whereby and where under the order dated 06.04.2022 contend in memo no.229 passed by the respondent no.7 selecting the petitioner for the post of Anganbari Sevika has been set aside (Annexure-P/7).
B. For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, appropriate writ/s or any other order/s, direction for the followings:-
I. To treat the annexures-P/8 and P/7 to be nullity and non-est in the eye of law.
To hold that the impugned orders are illegal and against the materials available on the record and the same have been passed without considering the relevant provisions of the guideline-2019.
The rest of the document can be viewed at https://patnahighcourt.gov.in/viewjudgment/MTUjMTA2NDYjMjAyNSMxI04=-SFfjYGPNLNM=
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
