PATNA, India, Aug. 4 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 15:
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection Commission and learned Counsel for the State.
2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs:-
"i. For commanding and directing the respondents to stay the operation of letter No. B.S.S.C - Pr. 03/Examination-22/2020(V) 1887/Aa. Dt. 19.05.2025 (Annexure P-7) issued under the signature of Secretary Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna, where by and where under final result of 63 candidates have been published in the light of advertisement issued at the district level for appointment to the post of office Peon/family (Special) as one time measure of the applicants.
ii. For issuance of an order, direction or writ including in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the case of petitioner who has participated in the selection process and also given written case on 15.09.2024.
iii. For Commanding and directing the respondents to provide exact vacant seat in the different offices of collectorate Jamui so that petitioners could be appointed.
iv. For commanding and directing the respondents to follow the guideline and direction has been given by this Hon'ble Court in C.W.J.C. No. 18612/2019 (Kapil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar and others) vide order dt. 18.12.2019.
v. For holding that petitioner is genuine and bonafide candidate for the purpose of appointment in the office of collectorate Jamui.
vi. For holding that advertisement for appointment has been published in the year 2012 and after selection appointment is going on in the year 2025 at this juncture case of the petitioner may be considered on the roster of ladies candidates.
vii. Further pleased to grant any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is legally entitled in the eye of law."
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of advertisement issued for filling up the vacancies of various departments, as a one time measure for the applicants who have submitted application earlier, the Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna, has conducted a competitive examination and final result of 63 candidates was published but result of the petitioner has not been published. Counsel submits that the petitioner is at serial No.64.
4. Learned Counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna, submits that the petitioner had appeared in the selection process but cannot be finally selected and there is no scope for selection of the petitioner when final result has been published.
5. In this view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere in this matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed.
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
