PATNA, India, Oct. 15 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Sept. 16:
Heard the parties.
2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner fairly submitted before this Court that despite the order passed by the District Appellate Authority, Gopalganj in Appeal No. 105 of 2024 vide order dated 26.06.2024-27.06.2024 directing the authorities to reinstate the petitioner in service within fortnight with back wages, till date the order has not been given effect to, compelling the petitioner to approach this Court.
3. Learned Advocate for the State has made a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition and submitted that by filing the present writ petition, the petitioner has tried to demean the majesty of the Court by making it to be an Executing Court. He further submits that there is already a provision under Rule 16 of the Bihar State Teaching Institutions Teachers and Employees (Dispute Redressal and Appeal) Rules, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as "Rules 2020") where she can approach the Appellate Authority for redressal of the grievance raised in the writ petition.
The rest of the document can be viewed at https://patnahighcourt.gov.in/viewjudgment/MTUjMTUyOTEjMjAyNSMxI04=-MduOLC7v2Fs=
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
