PATNA, India, Sept. 9 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 12:
In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):
"i. For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/ direction commanding and directing the respondents to release the Hero Splendor vehicle of the petitioner bearing Registration No.-UP-52CB-6236 which has been seized by the police in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No.-194 of 2025 for the offences under sections 317(5) of BNS and 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment Act), 2018.
(ii) For the further issuance of writ/order/ direction as your Lordship may deem fit and proper."
2. In support of the aforementioned relief, there is no demand before the competent authority in particularly under Rule of 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 read with amended sub Rule 2 of Rule 12A in the year 2022 and 2023.
3. In the absence of demand before the competent authority, the instant writ petition for writ of mandamus is not maintainable or it is pre-mature. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of as pre-mature.
4. Disposal of the instant writ petition would not be a hurdle for the petitioner to invoke remedy under Rule 12A of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 including amended provisions in the year 2022 and 2023. If such application is submitted in the prescribed form before the competent authority, the competent authority shall pass speaking order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such application.
5. With the above observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
