PATNA, India, July 23 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 11:
Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and Learned Counsel for the BISCOMAUN.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ application has been filed with the following reliefs:-
A) For quashing the memo No. Est/128/M/225 dated 13.04.2013 issued by the Managing Director, BISCOMAN (Respondent No. 3) which the by petitioner has been given Compulsory Retirement from the post of Assistant Store Manager, BISCOMAN.
(B) For quashing the entire departmental proceeding and memo no. EST/128/M/162 dated 10.04.2013 issued by Special Officer (Administration) BISCOMAN.
(C) For directing the respondents to pay full salary of the suspension period and other admissible and consequential dues to the petitioner.
(D) For directing the State respondent no.-1 and 2 to direct the BISCOMAUN authorities to take final decision in the matter of petitioner.
3. Counsel further submits that the action has been taken under the Bihar Government Servant (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as CCA Rules, 2005), which is apparent from the order impugned.
4. Counsel for the BISCOMAUN submits that in the light of the various decision passed by this Hon'ble Court i.e., order dated 22.07.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No.16990 of 2022, this writ petition is not maintainable against the BISCOMAUN.
5. Upon perusal of the said order, it transpires that this Court has made a series of discussions contained in paragraph Nos.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 which states as follows:-
The rest of the document can be viewed at https://patnahighcourt.gov.in/viewjudgment/MTUjNTUzMCMyMDE3IzEjTg==-UCEH9gP6jyo=
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
