PATNA, India, March 4 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 2:
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 305, 331(5), 334(2), 352, 351(2), 324(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per prosecution case, on 3.08.2025 at about 12:30 AM, on account of land dispute, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, armed with various weapons, started breaking wall of the house of informant. Upon protest, the accused persons entered the house of informant and snatched Rs. 40,000/- cash and some jewellery.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both parties are co-villagers and on account of on-going land dispute between the parties, altercation took place in which both sides inflicted injuries on each other. Case and counter case. Rest of the allegations are ornamental only to make the case grave.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation, case and counter case and other facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana, Dhaka, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Pachpakari P. S. Case No. 125 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
