JABALPUR, India, Feb. 9 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following Jan. 9:
Petitioners are aggrieved by observation in paragraph No.5 of the order in review that it is not a case of cyber fraud and clear case of dispute between daughter-in-law and parents-in-law. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that in terms of Sections 66-C and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act 2002, the conduct of the respondent may constitute an offence. He submits that the observation in paragraph No.5 precludes the petitioner from even approaching the Court of law from taking redressal of her grievances.
We note that the observation in paragraph no.5 of the order are only prima facie and accordingly we clarify order dated 11.12.2024 to the extent that the observation in paragraph no.5 that it is not a case of cyber fraud shall be treated as prima facie and shall not come in the way of the petitioner initiating appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
In case any proceedings are initiating the concerned Court will consider the same in accordance with law without being influenced by anything stated in order dated 11.12.2024.
The Review Petition, is accordingly, disposed of the above terms.
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
