RANCHI, India, July 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 24:

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner(s) as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Opposite party nos.1 and 2.

2. I.As filed in all these petitions for deleting the name of the O.P.No.2 has been allowed by the order dated 23.06.2025.

3. In all these C.M.Ps, common question of law and facts are involved and in view of that, all these CMPs are heard together with consent of the parties.

4. In C.M.P. No.948 of 2023, the challenge is made for quashing of the judgment dated 11.02.2019 and decree dated 28.02.2019 passed by the court of learned District Judge-VIII, Giridih, in Civil Appeal No.19 of 2005 whereby the learned court has been pleased to confirm the judgment dated 28.02.2005 and decree dated 17.03.2005, passed by learned Sub Ordinate Judge-I, Giridih in Civil Appeal No.59 of 1983. The prayer is also made for quashing the judgment of the learned court in Title (Arbitration) Suit No.59 of 1983 as well as quashing of the Arbitral Award dated 04.06.1989 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator.

5. In C.M.P. No.917 of 2023, the challenge is made for quashing of the judgment dated 11.02.2019 and decree dated 28.02.2019 passed by the court of learned District Judge-VIII, Giridih, in Civil Appeal No.22 of 2005 whereby the learned court has been pleased to confirm the judgment dated 28.02.2005 and decree dated 17.03.2005, passed by learned Sub Ordinate Judge-I, Giridih in Title (Arbitration) Suit No.62 of 1983. The prayer is also made for quashing the judgment of the learned court in Title Arbitration Suit No.62 of 1983 as well as quashing of the Arbitral Award dated 04.06.1989 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator.

6. In C.M.P. No.946 of 2023, the challenge is made for quashing of the judgment dated 11.02.2019 and decree dated 28.02.2019 passed by the court of learned District Judge-VIII, Giridih, in Civil Appeal No.20 of 2005 whereby the learned court has been pleased to confirm the judgment dated 28.02.2005 and decree dated 17.03.2005, passed by learned Sub Ordinate Judge-I, Giridih in Title (Arbitration) Suit No.60 of 1983. The prayer is also made for quashing the judgment of the learned court in Title Arbitration Suit No.60 of 1983 as well as quashing of the Arbitral Award dated 04.06.1989 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator.

7. In C.M.P. No.950 of 2023, the challenge is made for quashing of the judgment dated 11.02.2019 and decree dated 28.02.2019 passed by the court of learned District Judge-VIII, Giridih, in Civil Appeal No.21of 2005 whereby the learned court has been pleased to confirm the judgment dated 28.02.2005 and decree dated 17.03.2005, passed by learned Sub Ordinate Judge-I, Giridih in Title (Arbitration) Suit No.61 of 1983. The prayer is also made for quashing the judgment of the learned court in Title Arbitration Suit No.61 of 1983 as well as quashing of the Arbitral Award dated 04.06.1989 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator.

8. In C.M.P. No.1316 of 2023, the challenge is made for quashing of the judgment dated 11.02.2019 and decree dated 28.02.2019 passed by the court of learned District Judge-VIII, Giridih, in Civil Appeal No.23 of 2005 whereby the learned court has been pleased to confirm the judgment dated 28.08.2005 and decree dated 17.03.2005, passed by learned Sub Ordinate Judge-I, Giridih in Title (Arbitration) Suit No.63 of 1983. The prayer is also made for quashing the judgment of the learned court in Title Arbitration Suit No.63 of 1983 as well as quashing of the Arbitral Award dated 04.06.1989 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator.

*Rest of the document can be viewed at: (https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/cases/display_pdf.php?filename=tuqye3PhFs%2BBDn75ghiOpH198RsDvNAw0A3cx8yLMBtBhshEkxTQT9Y98Q93Qv5v&caseno=C.M.P./946/2023&cCode=1&cino=JHHC010288782023&state_code=7&appFlag=)

Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.