RANCHI, India, Feb. 19 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 19:

1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs :-

"(a) Rule Nisi for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 25.07.2017 passed in S.A.R Revision Case No. 39 of 2005 by Commissioner, South Chotanagpur Division, Ranchi, (Annexure-8) whereby and whereunder the instant revision petition has been dismissed and order passed in S.AR. Appeal Case No. 5 R 15 of 2004-2005 dated 29.06.2005 by Additional Collector, Ranchi has been upheld.

(b) For Nisi for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 29.06.2005 passed in S.A.R Appeal Case No. 5 R 15 of 2004-2005 by Additional Collector, Ranchi (Annexure-7) whereby and whereunder the instant Appeal has been dismissed and order dated 02.07.2004 passed in S.AR. Case No. 6/03-04 by Sub- Divisional Officer, Bundu has been upheld.

(c) Rule Nisi for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 02.07.2004 passed in S.A.R Case NO.6/03-04 TR 88/03-04 by SubDivisional Officer, Bundu (Annexure-6) whereby and whereunder order has been passed for restoration of land and to hand over ownership and possession of lands in question to Mundari Khut Katidar Shambhu Nath Singh, son of Late Dubraj Singh Munda of village Tunju, P.S Budnu, District- Ranchi within a period of one fortnight and Circle Officer, Bundu has been directed too effect the Dakhal Dahani.

(d) For issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing and commanding upon Respondents not to give effect to or to act in pursuance of or in furtherance of aforesaid three impugned order dated 25.07.2017, 29.06.2005 and 02.07.2004 and/or to withdraw/cancel/rescind the aforesaid three orders AND not to disturb the Petitioners from the peaceful possession of the lands in question and allow them to use it or cultivation process and do fishery business upon the pond constructed upon said plots by petitioners.."

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law.

3. Since the merit of the case has not been touched, no notice is required to be issued upon the private respondents.

4. Permission is accorded.

5. Accordingly, with the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition is, hereby, disposed of.

6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of.

Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.