RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24:

1. Both these petitions have been assigned to this Bench and that is how these matters have been listed before this Court.

2. CMP No.592 of 2025 has been filed for quashing of the order dated 18.02.2003 passed by Permanent Lok Adalat, Ranchi, in P.L.A. No. 270 of 2001, by which it has passed a compromise decree with respect of suit for Specific Performance of Contract being (Title Suit No. 12 of 2001) and thereafter has drawn the decree dated 04.03.2003.

3. Civil Revision No.17 of 2025 has been filed against the order dated 29.11.2024 passed by Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Ranchi, in Civil Miscellaneous Case No. 12 of 2020, in terms of which the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Ranchi has been pleased to dismiss the objection filed by the petitioner under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure in Execution Case No. 35 of 2020.

4. Mr. Bibhas Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the sole opposite party herein has initially instituted Title Suit No.12 of 2001 under Section 13 of the Specific Relief Act against the father of the present petitioner namely late Laxmi Narayan Sahu praying, inter alia, for the reliefs as follows:-

a) The defendant may be directed to execute and register sale deed in respect of the suit property which has been more fully described in Schedule 'A' of the plaint after receiving balance consideration from the plaintiff and failing which the learned Trial Court may be pleased to execute and register the deed of sale in favour of the plaintiff of the suit property after depositing the balance consideration money by the plaintiff in court and the plaintiff may be put in Khas Physical Possession through the process of the court if the learned Court found that the plaintiff is not in possession of the suit premises.

b) The alternative relief may be granted as money decree for a sum of Rs.6,19,000/- (Rupees Six Lacs Nineteen Thousand) only including the interest at the rate of 14% per annum from the date of entering into an agreement for sale of suit premises till the date of realization as damages and cost of prestige.

c) Decree for the cost of the suit be awarded in favour of the plaintiff. d) The right, title and possession of the plaintiff over the suit property may be declared and the order passed in M 495/2000 and the order dated 29.04.2000 declared null and void as it is not operative against the plaintiff.

*Rest of the document can be viewed at: (https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/cases/display_pdf.php?filename=A9S7c5LDIsB6RXaCf816x%2FDrMHzT7uD%2Bn21JnZIeB0I7ekUxHHOndsoA%2Bu5wrdU7&caseno=C.R./17/2025&cCode=1&cino=JHHC010059522025&state_code=7&appFlag=)

Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.