RANCHI, India, Aug. 13 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 14:
1. Heard the parties.
2. By filing this criminal writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayers:
(i) for issuance of a writ/rule/order or for a direction upon the respondents specially Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to investigate the FIR being Chaibasa Sadar PS Case No. 06 of 2025 in G.R. Case No. 142 of 2025 pending in the court of CJM, Chaibasa registered U/s 191(2), 191(3), 190, 127(1), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 361(2) and 352 and charge has been framed U/s 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 351(2) and 352 BNS, in a fair manner and submit chargesheet against respondent Nos. 5 to 9 as they are the named accused in this case having committed serious offence but for the reason best known to the Investigating Officer they were not charge-sheeted showing lack of evidence against them pending in the court of CJM, Chaibasa.
(ii) further direction upon the learned trial court to direct the police officer to reinvestigate the case and filed the chargesheet against respondent nos. 5 to 9 against whom there are serious allegation as levelled by the informant/petitioner.
(iii) petitioner further prays for a direction to add the non-bailable sections as mentioned in the First Informantion Report and filed chargesheet accordingly.
3. Admittedly from the argument of the petitioner, I find that chargesheet has already been submitted in this case after investigation. If the chargesheet has been already been submitted and the petitioner has got any grievance, the remedy lies in approaching the court concerned where cognizance is taken or where the trial is pending. The petitioner has rushed to this High Court by filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
4. I find no material to entertain this application, the same is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned Court as statutory remedy is available to him.
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
