RANCHI, India, March 25 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 20:

1. In compliance of the order passed by this Court in the present proceeding in the first half, the Corpus, i.e, the mother-in-law of the respondent no.6 has appeared in the Chamber.

2. We have interacted with the Corpus almost about 20 minutes in the Chamber on all the issues including the suffering which she had met in which all the family members, i.e., her husband, her son and her daughter had died in a road accident.

3. She has stated that she also sustained serious injuries and become unconscious and even she had not been apprised about the casualties which she had suffered after death of three members of her family.

4. This Court has specially put a query in order to have the view with respect to any coercion by the respondent no.6 upon the Corpus, the mother-in-law, regarding any greed of money, upon which she has stated that this is the false allegation and think sort of behaviour which is being meted out with her by her daughter-in-law, rather she has stated that her daughter-in-law (respondent no.6 herein) even is a Dental Surgeon but in order to take her care, she used to live in the house and simultaneously for the purpose of earning some money so that the house may run, she used to have some consultation work. She has stated that her daughter-in-law is also living the miserable life after the death of her husband in the said road accident.

5. This Court has also interacted with respect to the issue of any bad relationship of the Corpus with her sister-in-law, i.e., the writ petitioner herein.

6. She has stated that she is having no difficulty in having talking term to her, but whenever she used to come to her house at Ranchi she used to quarrel.

7. This Court after having interacted with the Corpus, the mother-in-law of the respondent no.6, has called upon her daughter-in-law also (the respondent no.6 herein).

8. The respondent no.6 has stated that she is living and leading her life only to maintain her mother-in-law, i.e., Corpus. 9. This Court thereafter has called upon the learned counsel for both the parties, who have appeared in the Chamber.

10. Thereafter, this Court has started dictating the order in their presence as has been referred hereinabove.

11. This Court, considering the aforesaid statement having been recorded, is of the view that it is not a case where any relief is to be granted to the writ petitioner.

12. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed.

Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.