GAUHATI HIGH COURT ISSUES ORDER ON SANDEEP BHARALI V/S THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS

GUWAHATI, India, June 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on April 30:

1. Heard Mr. B. M. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Upamanyu, learned Standing Counsel, Health & Family Welfare Department for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 9; Mr. A. Chaliha, learned Standing Counsel, Finance for the respondent Nos. 5 & 6; Mr. A. Chakraborty, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.7; and Ms. Tinglung, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R. K. Talukdar, learned counsel representing the respondent No.8.

2. The petitioner was appointed as a Junior Teacher in the Medical Institute, Jorhat, on 14.12.2010 and joined the service on 27.12.2010. After serving as a Junior Teacher for 10 (ten) years in the Medical Institute, Jorhat, the petitioner submitted his resignation on 02.01.2021. The resignation submitted by the petitioner was accepted by the competent authority on 17.11.2022 with effect from 02.01.2021, as desired and requested by the petitioner.

3. As no pensionary benefit was provided, the petitioner approached this Court by filing the present writ petition seeking the following reliefs from the respondent's authority:

i) To release/disburse the pensionary benefits, gratuity, and earned leave encashment, along with advance increments since joining the job, and arrear dues entitled under the 7th Pay Commission till the date of resignation.

ii) To release/disburse the entire amount contributed to the petitioner's Permanent Pension Account Number (PRAN No. 110001458408) under the New Defined Contribution Scheme, 2009, and to allow him to withdraw the entire amount so credited in his said account.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had rendered more than 10 years of continuous service and therefore he is entitled to pensionary benefits, gratuity and other consequential dues. It is contended that the resignation was tendered due to non-functioning and improper management of the institution and not with any intention to forfeit service benefits. It is further submitted that the petitioner is entitled to earned leave encashment, arrears under 7th Pay Commission and grant of advance increments from the date of joining. Additionally, it is argued that the amount accumulated in the petitioner's Permanent Retirement Account under the defined Contribution Pension Scheme, 2009 is his rightful entitlement and the respondent are bound to release the same. It is also contended that denial of benefits on the ground of non-submission of prescribed forms as contended by the respondent is arbitrary and technical in nature and hence, it violate the principle of natural justice.

5. The respondent No.4 filed an affidavit and contended that, as per Rule 62(a) of the Assam Services (Pension) Rules, 1969, since the petitioner voluntarily resigned from his service as a Junior Teacher in the Medical Institute, Jorhat, and his resignation has been accepted by the Medical Education & Research Department, his past service stands forfeited; hence, he is also not entitled to the benefit of leave encashment.

*Rest of the document can be viewed at: (https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/cases/display_pdf.php?filename=tuqye3PhFs%2BBDn75ghiOpIuN%2FtNK5E0OseI4Yv0nrxJcj5nd7tqmdVFISdBXtYNg&caseno=WP(C)/2593/2023&cCode=1&cino=GAHC010097182023&state_code=6&appFlag=)

Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.