GUWAHATI, India, Dec. 30 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Nov. 28:

1. Heard Mr. I. H. Saikia, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. I. Borthakur, learned Standing Counsel for the Excise Department appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4. I have also heard Ms. U. Das, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.3.

3. The brief fact of the case is that the petitioner was granted an IMFL Retail "OFF" Shop license at Demow Grant, Demow Town, Ward No.6, District Sivasagar, Assam which he has been operating by the name of Sri Hunmoni Phukan vide License No.114/2024 issued on 06.09.2024, in the rented premises of Sri Hitesh Deori of Dag No.671, P.P. No.352, situated at Demow Grant, Demow Town, Ward No.6, District Sivasagar.

4. It is the contention of the petitioner that the landlord under whose premises the wine shop has been running, has refused to extend the lease agreement on being expired. Having no alternative, the petitioner had to shift the said wine shop to a new location. The petitioner, accordingly applied for permission vide application dated 14.11.2024, for shifting of the said wine shop from its existing site situated at Demow Town to a new site at Demow Grant, Demow Town, Ward No.1 in Sivasagar District at the rented premises of one Sri. Dipak Kumar Agarwalla and Smti Hiramoni Devi Agarwalla covered under Dag No.937 and P.P. No.627. The petitioner has also deposited the requisite application fee for shifting to a tune of Rs.2,00,000/- (Two Lakhs) only, along with other relevant documents.

5. Mr. I. H. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner, while referring to the Assam Excise Rules, 2016, particularly, Rule 294-A submits that the shifting of premises licensed for wholesale or retail vend of foreign liquor, country spirit and heritage alcoholic beverages from one location to another within the same district is permissible in cases where the licencee is running his licensed shop at a place under rental deed and the landlord or owner of the place refused to extend the term of the lease. He submits that since the landlord under which the petitioner was running his license shop has refused to extend the terms of the lease, for which the petitioner has prayed for shifting of the license shop to another premises within the same District, which is permissible under the Rule, the rejection of the application for shifting of the license shop within the District is not sustainable. Therefore, the respondent authorities may be directed to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of the Assam Excise Rules, 2016.

*Rest of the document can be viewed at: (https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/cases/display_pdf.php?filename=A9S7c5LDIsB6RXaCf816x0CrmHE3zqkQsbe7lzqPUgewJTG13G7qev7EZ58goSUs&caseno=WP(C)/6755/2025&cCode=1&cino=GAHC010261762025&state_code=6&appFlag=)

Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.