GUWAHATI, India, June 7 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on May 7:
1. Heard Mr. B. D. Das, the learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. H. Rohman, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. H. K. Das, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Gauhati High Court. I have also heard Mr. M. Khan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.6.
g No.250 dated 09.12.2024 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, South Salmara, Mankachar (hereinafter referred to as 'the impugned order') primarily on the ground that the respondent authorities in order to appoint the respondent No.6 had given very high marks in the viva- voce test compared to all other candidates including the petitioner that too without prescribing such type of marks prior to the advertisement or till such date the respondent Selection Board had learnt that the petitioner herein had secured high marks in the test so conducted by the District Transport Authority.
3. To ascertain the merits of the said challenge, it is relevant to take note of the facts which led to the filing of the instant writ petition. 4. On 20.05.2022, the Chief Judicial Magistrate who is the respondent No.5 in the instant proceedings had issued an advertisement calling from intending eligible candidates for filling up of various posts. The subject matter of the instant writ petition pertains to the post of driver. In the said advertisement, the details in respect to the driver being relevant is reproduced herein under.
*Rest of the document can be viewed at: (https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/cases/display_pdf.php?filename=bzPoyUlszYLCUcCpirIpqPk0lGnJczyPULeMUOKK0SlVy%2B%2ByN4xIbMESNwklF4Hh&caseno=WP(C)/6669/2024&cCode=1&cino=GAHC010263422024&state_code=6&appFlag=)
Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication.
