RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: Ms. Akriti Shree, learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction of his client seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Both these petitions have been assigned to this Bench and that is how these matters have been listed before this Court. 2. CMP No.592 of 2025 has been filed for quashing of the order dated 18.02.2003 passed by Permanent Lok Adalat, Ranchi, in P.L.A. No. 270 of 2001, by which it has passed a compromise decree with respect of suit for Specific Performance of Contract being (Title Suit No. 12 of 2001) and ...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case before trial Court has already been disposed of, therefore, this criminal revision has become infructuous. 2. Learned A.P.P. has no objection to the aforesaid argument. 3. Considering the submission, this criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous. 4. I.A., if any, also stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Roy, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 09.01.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Giridih in A.B.P. No. 2151/2025 in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 277/2024, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected. 3. It has been alleged that so...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: I.A. No. 15401 of 2025 1. This I.A. seeking condonation of delay of 71 days is allowed and disposed of. L.P.A. No. 791 of 2025 With I.A. No. 4227 of 2026 2. Heard Mr Krishna Murari, the learned counsel for the appellants and Ram Prakash Sao, the respondent-writ petitioner, who appears in person. 3. The learned counsel for the appellants almost succeeded in persuading us to dispose of this Letters Pate...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. Sudhir Sahay, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant's only objection is to the observation in paragraph-4 of the learned Single Judge's order dated 23rd July, 2025 of which suggests that the appellant wanted to avoid competition and perpetuate monopoly. He submits that this is incorrect and, in any event, there is no bar for grant ...
RANCHI, India, April 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This L.P.A. challenges the learned Single Judge's order dated 9th June, 2025 dismissing the appellant's W.P.(S) No.2394 of 2021, on various grounds. 3. The impugned order indicates that an objection was raised to the maintainability of the petition on the ground that the 5th respondent, i.e. Sri Ramakrishna Sarada Ashrama, Teacher's Training College, Hazaribag...
GUWAHATI, India, April 24 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 24: [1] Heard Mr. I.A. Hazariaka, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent. [2] This revision is directed against the appellate court judgment and order dated 31.07.2009/11.08.2009, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Darrang at Mangaldai in Crl. Appeal No. 13(D-1) of 2007 by which the judgment and order of the learned Chief Judi...
GUWAHATI, India, April 24 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Heard Mr. Mr. A. Ahmed and Mr. N. Mahajan, learned counsels for the appellants. Also heard Ms. A. Begum, learned Senior Advocate and Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam and Ms. J. Saikia and Ms. S. Sharma, learned Legal Aid counsels, respondent No. 2. 2. The instant criminal appeal has been preferred under section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 (as it existed then) by the appellant Basir Udd...
GUWAHATI, India, April 24 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on March 24: 1. Heard Mr. Mr. A. Ahmed and Mr. N. Mahajan, learned counsels for the appellants. Also heard Ms. A. Begum, learned Senior Advocate and Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam and Ms. J. Saikia and Ms. S. Sharma, learned Legal Aid counsels, respondent No. 2. 2. The instant criminal appeal has been preferred under section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 (as it existed then) by the appellant Basir Udd...