IMPHAL, India, April 1 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: Due to paucity of time, hearing of these cases cannot be taken up today. On the joint request made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, list these cases again on 20.03.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. O. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. N. Kothari, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent. 2. The crux of the present criminal petition is the order dated 16.03.2024 passed by the Court of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.5, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati in Criminal Appeal No. 27/2024 by which the appellant herein was directed to pay 20% of the total compensation...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. B. K. Mahajan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accusedapplicant. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., representing the State and Mr. J. Sehgal, learned counsel appearing for the Informant. 2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, praying for granting bail to the accused-applicant in connection with Teok Police Station Case No. 146/2025, registered u...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. P. Bhowmick, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. K. P. Pathak, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 2. The Petitioner herein which is a company engaged in the business of plantation, manufacture and sale of black tea had assailed the order dated 19.09.2017 passed in Review Petition No.1/2017 as well as the Bill dated 03...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the non-payment of the admitted amount of Rs.10,08,000/- by the Respondent Authorities to the petitioner for the works executed by the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner herein is that the petitioner has been allotted the works vide work orders dated 17.06.2015, 02.05.2015 and 07.02.2018 issued by the respondent No.2. The total value ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. O. P. Bhati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. P. Nayak, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD who have been arrayed as respondents in the instant proceedings. PREFACE 2. All the writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner who claims that he is a Class-I registered contractor with the Public Works Department of ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. O. P. Bhati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. P. Nayak, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD who have been arrayed as respondents in the instant proceedings. PREFACE 2. All the writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner who claims that he is a Class-I registered contractor with the Public Works Department of ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. O. P. Bhati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. P. Nayak, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD who have been arrayed as respondents in the instant proceedings. PREFACE 2. All the writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner who claims that he is a Class-I registered contractor with the Public Works Department of ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. O. P. Bhati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. P. Nayak, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD who have been arrayed as respondents in the instant proceedings. PREFACE 2. All the writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner who claims that he is a Class-I registered contractor with the Public Works Department of ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. O. P. Bhati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. P. Nayak, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD who have been arrayed as respondents in the instant proceedings. PREFACE 2. All the writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner who claims that he is a Class-I registered contractor with the Public Works Department of ...