NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. Heard Shri Tarun Pande and Shri Ashish Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner-firm, and Ms. Puja Banga, learned counsel for the respondents-State. 2. The petitioner-firm has assailed the order dated 21.08.2024 passed by respondent no. 2, under Section 73(9) of the C.G.S.T Act/ UKGST Act, demanding tax of Rs. 7,97,278/-, along with interest of Rs. 7,49,442/- and penalty of Rs. 79,728/-,...
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition, with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition with proper prayers. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. 3. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Lalit Samant, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Condition No. 1 in the Tender Notice, whereby the intending bidder should be a domicile of the State. It is submitted that such a condition, in Tender Notice dated 02.03.2026, is violative of Articles 14 & 19 of the Constitution of Indi...
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. Heard Mr. Tarun Pande, learned counsel for the petitioner-firm, and Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ Revenue Department. 2. The petitioner-firm has assailed the order dated 29.05.2025 passed under Section 73 of the CGST/ UKGST Act, 2017, in respect of Financial Year 2021-22. The sole submission of learned counsel for the petitioner-firm is that, in the show...
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. Heard Mr. Tarun Pande, learned counsel for the petitioner-firm, and Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ Revenue Department. 2. The petitioner-firm has assailed the order dated 17.02.2025 passed under Section 73 of the CGST/ UKGST Act, 2017, in respect of Financial Year 2020-21. The sole submission of learned counsel for the petitioner-firm is that, in the show...
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. Heard Mr. Pradeep Singh Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner-firm, and Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ Revenue Department. 2. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "a. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned Order issued under section 73(9) of the UKSGST Act, 2017 uploaded ...
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. Heard Mr. Tarun Pande, learned counsel for the petitioner-firm, and Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ Revenue Department. 2. The petitioner-firm has assailed the order dated 13.01.2025 passed under Section 73 of the CGST/ UKGST Act, 2017, in respect of Financial Year 2020-21. The sole submission of learned counsel for the petitioner-firm is that, in the show...
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. This Appeal, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is directed against the judgment and order dated 10.07.2019 passed by the Additional District Judge (Commercial), Dehradun, in Arbitration Case No. 160/2016, whereby the petition filed by respondent no. 1 (hereinafter, referred to as the 'respondent-company'), under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. The present Criminal Revision has been preferred by the Revisionist challenging the legality and propriety of the impugned order passed by the learned Magistrate whereby the Revisionist was remanded to judicial custody. 2. The factual background, in brief, is that the Revisionist was arrested in connection with an offence registered under the relevant penal provisions. The arrest was effecte...
NAINITAL, India, April 17 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 17: 1. Mr. J.C. Karnatak, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. The present Bail Application has been moved by the Applicant, namely Shiwansh Rawat, aged about 24 years, S/o Shailesh Rawat, R/o Bhatt Colony, Mukhani, P.S. Mukhani, District Nainital. The Applicant is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. ...